|
Post by Administrator on Jun 15, 2009 12:17:09 GMT -5
Discuss the Maryland Maniacs @ Rochester Raiders Week 16 matchup here.
|
|
|
Post by rochesterfan on Jun 19, 2009 6:12:27 GMT -5
If Maryland beats Bloomington , this game brings a spotlight to it of title contention. Shawn Hackett and Ed Bynes will be playing in this game. The raiders will be the closest it has been to last years team. It becomes an interesting game before the playoffs. Raiders by 6.
|
|
|
Post by Banana Cat on Jun 21, 2009 13:49:11 GMT -5
Maryland got demolished by Bloomington.
Playing at Rochester, I think they lose this game too. If both teams finish 10-4 I wonder who gets the tiebreakers.
|
|
IFFan
Cleans the Towels
Posts: 24
|
Post by IFFan on Jun 21, 2009 19:30:53 GMT -5
Maryland....already beat them twice H2H.
|
|
IFFan
Cleans the Towels
Posts: 24
|
Post by IFFan on Jun 24, 2009 7:47:00 GMT -5
Maryland....already beat them twice H2H. Maybe I was wrong....league website game preview says that Rochester can still win the division. Anyone know the tiebreaker rules??
|
|
|
Post by exit322 on Jun 24, 2009 8:51:20 GMT -5
The Raiders have said on other boards that they would lose a tiebreaker against Maryland. And if they say something like that that may discredit their team...it must be true.
|
|
|
Post by Banana Cat on Jun 24, 2009 11:27:37 GMT -5
First tiebreaker is record against common opponents (which would include head to head). That means it's possible to win the season series with a team and still lose out on the first tiebreaker (which is idiotic to not be H2H first, but this was more than likely put in place because of the uneven schedule). I hope they fix this next year, but wouldn't be surprised if they didn't.
|
|