|
Post by ThrowItTo7 on Oct 30, 2010 8:17:46 GMT -5
What the hell? 2 bye weeks in the first three weeks, all bye weeks in first half of the schedule? What gives? Storm opponents make up this schedule to help them make their playoff runs? What a load. I am sure the Storm will have a lot if injuries to heal up on weeks 1 and 3. They should at least get to start practice the same week as everyone instead of going into our first game down a week of practice and with no games under our belts.
|
|
|
Post by Micah008 on Oct 30, 2010 9:48:07 GMT -5
You are incorrect. Sioux Falls really has their byes week 2 and week 7.
Their website makes it look like they have a Bye week on the weekend of Feb 19th, but essentially no teams play that weekend (just one game is happening as a "kickoff" that weekend). This year it is a 16 week schedule, so there are only 2 Bye weeks per team.
|
|
|
Post by wichitawild on Oct 30, 2010 13:12:59 GMT -5
Chill Storm Fan. Not everyone is out to get you. Check out Wichita's schedule. The Wild are done with bye's at Week 4. The Conference race very well could be between Wichita and Sioux Falls again. Great teams overcome these difficulties. I fully expect Wichita and Sioux Falls to be a great rivalry again this year despite bye week problems by both teams.
|
|
|
Post by Banana Cat on Oct 30, 2010 13:47:06 GMT -5
The three best teams in the United Conference last year were Sioux Falls, Wichita, and Omaha...and with Billings' departure, they're now the three best teams in the league...all still within one division...sigh.
|
|
|
Post by Micah008 on Oct 30, 2010 17:25:45 GMT -5
After a closer look, there are at least 7 teams that have "worse" Bye weeks than Sioux Falls (2, 7)
West Texas - 1, 3 Wyoming - 1, 3 Nebraska - 1, 3 Wichita - 1, 4 Omaha - 2, 4 Lehigh Valley - 3, 5
|
|
|
Post by Banana Cat on Oct 30, 2010 18:01:44 GMT -5
Nice job.
|
|