|
Post by Banana Cat on May 4, 2011 18:55:20 GMT -5
IFL Rankings for Week 11 In the Overall Rankings, Sioux Falls remains #1, while Tri-Cities moved up to #2 for the first time. Tri-Cities, Allen, Wichita, and Amarillo made the biggest rise up the standings, each moving up two spots. Wyoming took the biggest fall (for the second straight week) with a three spot drop to 12th. Allen moved into the top ten, while Wyoming droped out of it.
Thanks to all who voted in the Top 10 Poll. Keep the votes coming each and every week and anyone else that would like to chime in is welcome to do so as well.
----------
The IFL Top 10 Poll results are tabulated from votes of Indoor Football Forum members. To get your vote heard in upcoming polls, follow the directions here: indoorfootballboard.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=generalifl&action=display&thread=4079
The OtB Computer Rankings are based on points scored, win/loss record, ranking of the opponents that a team faced, yards, fumbles, interceptions, penalties, and a few other statistics. For more OtB analysis, go here: outsidetheboards.com/?page_id=365
The Massey Computer Rankings are based on in-depth calculations of final scores. For more Massey analysis, go here: www.masseyratings.com/rate.php?lg=ifl
The Bradley-Terry Computer Rankings are based off a formula on who teams win and lose against. For more Bradley-Terry IFL analysis, go here: ezfootballrankings.com/ifl-1.php
|
|
|
Post by CF4L on May 4, 2011 19:18:53 GMT -5
My rankings were as follows:
IFL Top 10 1. Sioux Falls Storm 2. Tri-Cities Fever 3. Colorado ICE 4. Omaha Beef 5. Green Bay Blizzard 6. Bloomington Extreme 7. West Texas Roughnecks 8. Wyoming Cavalry 9. Reading Express 10. Fairbanks Grizzlies
|
|
|
Post by Micah008 on May 4, 2011 20:37:06 GMT -5
My personal rankings were:
1. Sioux Falls 2. Tri-Cities 3. Green Bay 4. Bloomington 5. Omaha 6. Colorado 7. West Texas 8. Chicago 9. Nebraska 10. Fairbanks
|
|
|
Post by sportznut on May 4, 2011 22:10:17 GMT -5
1. Souix Falls Storm 2. Colorado Ice 3. Bloomington Extreme 4. Greenbay Blizzard 5. West Texas Roughnecks 6. Tri Cities Fever 7. Reading Express 8. Allen Wranglers 9. Chicago Slaughter 10. Fairbanks Grizzlies
|
|
|
Post by Banana Cat on May 4, 2011 23:49:27 GMT -5
Someone's got an Omaha bias. Reading has only beaten three teams and they all reside at the bottom of the rankings.
|
|
|
Post by Banana Cat on May 5, 2011 0:05:08 GMT -5
I fixed an error, astutely pointed out by Micah, on La Crosse's spot in the rankings. I calculated their average wrong and they are actually in 14th and not 16th.
|
|
|
Post by Micah008 on May 5, 2011 8:03:45 GMT -5
I fixed an error, astutely pointed out by Micah, on La Crosse's spot in the rankings. I calculated their average wrong and they are actually in 14th and not 16th. I only noticed because it seemed strange that they moved down a few spots after a 51-0 win, so I took a look.
|
|
|
Post by Micah008 on May 5, 2011 12:58:12 GMT -5
For anyone that follows the Massey ratings closely, I wanted to pass along something I noticed...
On Massey, Seattle has two games not entered in there properly, and I think it has to do with the name change from Kent to Seattle, since the issues started at the same time.
I just contacted Massey by email to make him aware. But, in the meantime, the Massey rankings/predictions for Seattle, Wenatchee and Tri-Cities are not correct, since there are games missing.
|
|
|
Post by Micah008 on May 5, 2011 14:39:46 GMT -5
FYI, I heard back, and he said he will get it fixed.
Since I was writing to him, I also asked about what Stats he uses (since there has been some debate in the past on what he truly uses). His answer was "I just use the score".
Since all of his analysis is based on score, and doesn't use other stats... even if the IFL doesn't have all of the stats complete, the Massey ratings (and Bradley-Terry) are still valid and correct.
|
|
|
Post by Banana Cat on May 5, 2011 17:19:50 GMT -5
Very good info, thanks.
|
|
|
Post by sportznut on May 5, 2011 20:40:28 GMT -5
Seriously don not have an Omaha Bias, Just not sold on them yet, They come in at 11... lol
|
|