|
Post by Banana Cat on Nov 4, 2010 2:03:11 GMT -5
POLL QUESTION: Which of the 5 "dormant" IFL teams will return in 2012? You can select one or more answers.www.goifl.com/news/?article_id=2840Strengthening the league...suuuuuuure. I can see West Michigan and Maryland's departure being interpreted that way, but not defending champion Billings, or playoff teams Rochester and San Angelo.
|
|
|
Post by Bouncer_Texxx on Nov 4, 2010 8:32:45 GMT -5
I'll play the history card and say none of the above. Billings, maybe... but support for a fledgling franchise would be minimal
|
|
|
Post by Micah008 on Nov 4, 2010 10:24:45 GMT -5
You can also read what they said as the "strengthening" only being the departures... and the dormant teams as a separate topic. (They should have put a period somewhere in that sentence if that is what they meant.)
I voted for Billings by the way... it may be a completely different team from the ground up, and maybe even a different team name... but it obviously is a market where Indoor Football can do well.
|
|
|
Post by CF4L on Nov 4, 2010 12:39:45 GMT -5
come on, none of these teams will return.
|
|
|
Post by banditsleapzone on Nov 4, 2010 16:35:05 GMT -5
Im with CF4L none will return. I dont see the reasoning behind your period statement.Sioux City has always paid ALL bills on time.What more can you ask. Carolyns step brother Tommy runs this league
|
|
|
Post by Banana Cat on Nov 4, 2010 17:15:54 GMT -5
I voted none as well.
I could see San Angelo having the best shot of all the above to return since the Amarillo owner DID buy them before they went dormant (so he's got some money in the thing). After that, I could see the IFL looking to find new owners to bring back Billings as a possibility of them being resurrected. Rochester is an extreme long shot and I don't think Maryland or West Michigan will be back (1% of a chance for those two).
|
|