|
Post by scout200 on Nov 12, 2010 16:07:18 GMT -5
In your opinion, what team could the IFL do without if they had to eliminate one team?
-Scout
|
|
|
Post by Micah008 on Nov 12, 2010 16:16:16 GMT -5
Well, it depends on why you are eliminating them...
To let others gets more wins: Sioux Falls To reduce travel expenses: Fairbanks Ugliest cheerleaders: ?
Plus, I would think 2 would need to go, having an odd number of teams isn't any good for scheduling.
|
|
|
Post by Micah008 on Nov 12, 2010 16:22:35 GMT -5
Thought of a few more... Ugliest Colors (sorry, not a fan of them) : Lehigh Valley Joined too late (Billings wasn't let in, right? ): Oklahoma City
|
|
|
Post by Bouncer_Texxx on Nov 12, 2010 19:21:42 GMT -5
Geographically, Fairbanks and Arizona.
Now, keep in mind a pretty decent guy is coaching up in FBX now, so I rather enjoy their presence. he's one of the few that understand the power of pineapple...
|
|
|
Post by Banana Cat on Nov 13, 2010 0:01:27 GMT -5
In your opinion, what team could the IFL do without if they had to eliminate one team? They just eliminated (so to speak) 40% of their teams, I think that's enough for now.
|
|
|
Post by scout200 on Nov 17, 2010 18:38:34 GMT -5
Well, it depends on why you are eliminating them... To let others gets more wins: Sioux Falls To reduce travel expenses: Fairbanks Ugliest cheerleaders: ? You would seriously consider "ugliest cheerleaders" as a reasoning to eliminate a team? lol
|
|
|
Post by Micah008 on Nov 17, 2010 20:31:29 GMT -5
Silly question. Silly answer.
|
|
|
Post by Micah008 on Nov 30, 2010 17:14:53 GMT -5
What is your answer scout?
|
|