|
Post by tearsinabucket on Feb 16, 2009 18:19:25 GMT -5
And my point wasnt between the Storm and Omaha it was between Sioux City and the Beef. Storm got the division its just a matter of who gets the scraps left over from the Storms Big Boy table! Booyaw!
|
|
|
Post by afan on Feb 16, 2009 18:47:26 GMT -5
Why do you assume that it is an automatic loss vs. Storm? If that's your thought, then SF already has the division. Personally, I'd rather play the big games - which one is going to draw more fans? vs. the Storm - or say an easier victory - vs. the Wild? I'm not even a Storm or Beef fan, but your argument just makes no sense to me.
|
|
|
Post by afan on Feb 16, 2009 18:48:21 GMT -5
So playing the storm one time(1 loss) over 3 times(3 losses) is disadvantage? please get over yourself. I bet Sioux City would trade Scheduals in a second flat. Lets see if you were the Bills would you Rather have the Patriots three times or one time at their place? Simple answer. 1 time in foxbourough I'd say three times - 2 home sellouts.
|
|
|
Post by tearsinabucket on Feb 16, 2009 18:54:52 GMT -5
Are you trying to sell out games or win them and position yourself for a championship? You and Bob Scott would get along great! And if you go 13 and 3 and get home playoff games that is where you get your money. And yes my thoughts are the storm has the division. Omaha is just playing for 2nd
|
|
|
Post by afan on Feb 16, 2009 21:14:41 GMT -5
Build a franchise. Takes fans - as well as wins. But watching your team beat up on lesser teams all season doesn't keep butts in the seats. Maybe I should meet Bob Scott someday.
|
|
|
Post by Doom on Feb 16, 2009 23:46:31 GMT -5
He could do you taxes, that he does do well >_> lol.
|
|
|
Post by msantamaria on Feb 17, 2009 18:04:55 GMT -5
Are you trying to sell out games or win them and position yourself for a championship? You and Bob Scott would get along great! And if you go 13 and 3 and get home playoff games that is where you get your money. And yes my thoughts are the storm has the division. Omaha is just playing for 2nd They certainly have a leg up. Like I said before, they get a chance on their home turf to basically go two games clear of Omaha. The win would be one, and the tiebreaker would be the second. As for your question, you could call the Beef offices here in Omaha this moment and ask if they'd prefer seeing SF 3 times on their schedule with 2 home games or just the once on the road. I'm quite certain you'd get an emphatic preference towards the 3 game series. Unbalanced scheduling is extremely favorable to the team who gets the most home games and thinking that Omaha fixed the schedule to its present state is just wrong. You also seem to be forgetting that Omaha ran SF out of the Civic last season. So to assume three losses under your hypothetical schedule is entirely unfounded. That said, you play the schedule in front of you, and Omaha will have to play extremely well to win in SF. I doubt they are complaining, anyway, since the schedule worked out in their favor with SF last year (lone game in Omaha).
|
|